nanog mailing list archives
RE: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City
From: "Soni, Miraaj" <msoni () virtela net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:00:56 -0700
No. It doesn't prevent it from happening again. But at least you can have them check for that same issue when it happens next time. I guess the RFO gives the customer the feeling that the vendor was able to isolate the issue and fix it; as opposed to "issue was resolved before isolation". - Miraaj Soni -----Original Message----- From: Joe Maimon [mailto:jmaimon () ttec com] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:46 AM To: Brad Fleming Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Brad Fleming wrote:
In either case I'm a customer and will likely never be told what went
wrong. I'm OK with that so long as it doesn't happen again!
Does being told what happened somehow prevent it from happening it again? What is the utilitarian value in an RFO? Joe
Current thread:
- ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City comptech (Nov 29)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Brad Fleming (Nov 30)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Stefan (Nov 30)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Blake Hudson (Nov 30)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Brad Fleming (Nov 30)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Joe Maimon (Nov 30)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Brad Fleming (Nov 30)
- RE: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Holmes,David A (Nov 30)
- RE: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Soni, Miraaj (Nov 30)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Mike Jones (Nov 30)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Stefan (Nov 30)
- Re: ATT GigE issue on 11/19 in Kansas City Brad Fleming (Nov 30)