nanog mailing list archives
RE: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:18:16 +0000
Look at the number that are refusing to make generous prefix allocations to residential end users and limiting them to /56, /60, or even worse, /64.
Owen, What does Joe Sixpack do at home with a /48 that he cannot do with a /56 or a /60? Nathan
Current thread:
- Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Seth Mos (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nick Hilliard (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Daniel Roesen (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- RE: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nathan Eisenberg (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Gary Buhrmaster (Nov 21)
- RE: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nathan Eisenberg (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Joel jaeggli (Nov 24)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Seth Mos (Nov 24)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Mohacsi Janos (Nov 25)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Daniel Roesen (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Joel Maslak (Nov 22)