nanog mailing list archives

Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US


From: Mark Radabaugh <mark () amplex net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:35:34 -0500

On 11/21/11 10:32 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
On an Illinois water utility:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45359594/ns/technology_and_science-security

Cheers,
-- jra
Having worked on plenty of industrial and other control systems I can safely say security on the systems is generally very poor. The vulnerabilities have existed for years but are just now getting attention. This is a problem that doesn't really need a bunch of new legislation. It's an education / resource issue. The existing methods that have been used for years with reasonable success in the IT industry can 'fix' this problem.

Industrial Controls systems are normally only replaced when they are so old that parts can no longer be obtained. PC's started to be widely used as operator interfaces about the time Windows 95 came out. A lot of those Win95 boxes are still running and have been connected to the network over the years.

And... if you can destroy a pump by turning it off and on too often then somebody engineered the control and drive system incorrectly. Operators (and processes) do stupid things all the time. As the control systems engineer your supposed to deal with that so that things don't go boom.


--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex

mark () amplex net  419.837.5015



Current thread: