nanog mailing list archives
Re: economic value of low AS numbers
From: Sebastian Spies <s+Mailinglisten.nanog () sloc de>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:04:12 +0100
Hi Dave, On 17.11.2011 15:53, Dave Hart wrote:
I recognize there's no practical shortage of AS numbers. BGP's preference for low AS numbers doesn't come into play much. On the other hand, a low AS number can't hurt at the human level when negotiating peering or attracting customers.
Could you explain, what you mean with "BGP's preference for low AS numbers". Sebastian
Current thread:
- economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Sebastian Spies (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Leo Bicknell (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Kevin Loch (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers David Conrad (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Hank Nussbacher (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Richard Irving (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers David Conrad (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)