Re: where was my white knight....

[Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>]

On 8 Nov 2011, at 18:24, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:

> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:14 AM, <bmanning () vacation karoshi com> wrote:
>
> > that was/is kindof orthoginal to the question... would the sidr plan for routing security have been a help in this 
> > event? 
>
> SIDR is intended to provide route-origination validation - it isn't intended to be nor can it possibly be a remedy 
> for vendor-specific implementation problems.
>
> Validation storm-control is something which must be accounted for in SIDR/DANE architecture, implementation, and 
> deployment.  But at the end of the day, vendors are still responsible for their own code.

Indeed, we can expect new and exciting ways to blow up networks with SIDR. 


--
Leigh


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________