nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cell-based OOB management devices
From: Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:28:25 -0800
On Nov 6, 2011 10:15 PM, "David Hubbard" <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com> wrote:Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for out of band management during emergencies.
I've used the Digi devices for Clearwire site OOB and in many retail situations where they are use for backup connection and for when the wire line hasn't been delivered yet. They do come with a static IP address if you request (and pay?) for it. They can come from the shared mobile IP range (RFC 2002) so that you can keep the static IP as you move between tower sites. You can also get them "piped" right in to your net via a VPN, although I suspect that is only affordable for a very large install base. Real world 3G bandwidth is about 1Mb/s down and 300Kb/s down. RTT (ping) is around 185ms to a local IXP (which kinda sucks for terminal support, but still better than a POTS modem.) -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
Current thread:
- Cell-based OOB management devices David Hubbard (Nov 06)
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices Seth Mattinen (Nov 06)
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices Dobbins, Roland (Nov 06)
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices Cameron Byrne (Nov 07)
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices Joe Hamelin (Nov 07)
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices rcheung (Nov 15)
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices Faisal Imtiaz (Nov 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices Edward Salonia (Nov 07)
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices rcheung (Nov 15)
- RE: Cell-based OOB management devices Ryan Finnesey (Nov 15)
- Re: Cell-based OOB management devices PC (Nov 15)
- RE: Cell-based OOB management devices Ryan Finnesey (Nov 15)
- RE: Cell-based OOB management devices Ryan Finnesey (Nov 15)