nanog mailing list archives
Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () kl net>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:22:31 -0400
Christopher Pilkington wrote:
Is it common in the industry for a colocation provider, when requested to put an egress ACL facing us such as: deny udp any a.b.c.d/24 eq 80 …to refuse and tell us we must subscribe to their managed DDOS product?
We have always accommodated temporary ACL's for active DDOS attacks. I think that is fairly standard across the ISP/hosting industry. I do feel it is bad practice to regularly implement customer specific ACL's on routers. If a customer wants a managed firewall we have a full range of those services available. - Kevin
Current thread:
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Kevin Loch (Nov 01)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Jack Bates (Nov 01)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Jimmy Hess (Nov 01)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Adam Rothschild (Nov 02)