nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:54:14 +0000
Hi Cameron, On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 21:31 -0800, Cameron Byrne wrote:
There are a variety of reasons. Most prominent is that if the issue is lack of IPv4 addresses (public and private), dual-stack does not solve this problem, each device still gets an IPv4 address. Another major issue is that in GSM/UMTS (3GPP pre-release 9), having dual-stack means having 2 attachments to the network, one for v4 and one for v6. Most mobile providers pay for most of their network kit in terms of these attachments known as PDP. Consequently, dual-stack doubles the of the packet-core network. If we take the licensing and contractual parts out of the equations, double the attachments means double the signalling and mobility events ... resulting in double the CPU / Memory / blah ...
That'll probably explain it... Thanks. :)
LTE does not have the dual attachment problem since there is the concept of having v4 and v6 in one attachment, but it does not change the fact that there are not enough IPv4 addresses to go around, especially from a strategic planning perspective (let's design this once for 5 to 10+ year life ...)
If only the UK was as far ahead on LTE as the US! Tom
Current thread:
- IPv6 beta support for Android phones Cameron Byrne (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Pete Carah (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Joel Jaeggli (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Tom Hill (Nov 06)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones PC (Nov 06)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Cameron Byrne (Nov 06)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 06)
- RE: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Leigh Porter (Nov 07)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Stuart Henderson (Nov 07)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Tom Hill (Nov 07)
- Re: IPv6 beta support for Android phones Pete Carah (Nov 04)