nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space


From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:26:56 -0700

On May 24, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Jeremy wrote:
As long as necessary precautions are taken (route filters, tunnels, VRF's)
shouldn't this be technically feasible without any negative ramifications?

Any? Debatable. Doing stuff like this has costs, but I suspect the folks at Rogers aren't idiots and actually did a 
cost/benefit analysis. 

Couldn't
you theoretically use anyone's IP space, advertised or not, for this
internal transit?

Yes.

I'm not saying it's a good idea, it's certainly more
complex which leads to its own issues, but shouldn't it be possible?

Of course.  Not even sure it is more complex. 

Regards,
-drc



Current thread: