nanog mailing list archives
Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:03:18 -0700
On May 12, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Michael Sabino wrote:
If you are a big corporation, and it is 1995, how likely is it that you'll utilize bgp for advertising your address space to the internet? Thanks, Michael Sabino
Big? Very. Matthew Kaufman
Current thread:
- coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Michael Sabino (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Matthew Kaufman (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Dorian Kim (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Dorn Hetzel (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Kevin Oberman (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Dorn Hetzel (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s George Herbert (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s cja () daydream com (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Tony Li (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Brett Watson (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Hank Nussbacher (May 12)
- Re: coprorations using BGP for advertising prefixes in mid-1990s Dorian Kim (May 12)