nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
From: Bernhard Schmidt <berni () birkenwald de>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:20:50 +0200
Hi,
Bernhard Schmidt <berni () birkenwald de> wrote on 05/12/2011 06:27:38 AM:Anthony Francis - Handy Networks LLC <anthony () handynetworks com> wrote:I can confirm full IPV6 connectivity from HE.How can you confirm that when HE just admitted to be lacking IPv6 routes from Cogent and a couple of other players?Anyone know roughly the current default-free routing table size for IPv6?
grh.sixxs.net shows around 5600 prefixes for most participants. But it depends on filters as well, I run strict filters (no more than /35 in PA space) and have around 4300 prefixes.
Or, who holds the record for the largest IPv6 routing table at this point?
I don't think the absolute number of prefixes is a valid metric. There is too many more-specific junk with partial visibility floating around. Bernhard
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Martin Millnert (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jimmy Hess (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeff Wheeler (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Matthew Petach (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joe Loiacono (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Bernhard Schmidt (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joel Maslak (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 12)