nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
From: Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:30:23 -0700
On 05/11/2011 11:21, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
Unless you have a captive audience for customers, you probably have a churn rate higher than 0.1%*anyhow*.
This argument has already been refuted many times. Let's assume that you're right about the churn rate. The issue is enterprises not wanting to take affirmative steps to knock N% *more* customers off the site than whatever the current churn rate is by enabling IPv6.
-- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jared Mauch (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Tore Anderson (May 11)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 11)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joel Jaeggli (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging nick hatch (May 11)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Doug Barton (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Mike Tancsa (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging William Astle (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging ML (May 11)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Sasa Ristic (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging Anthony Francis - Handy Networks LLC (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Bernhard Schmidt (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joe Loiacono (May 12)