nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
From: Scott Whyte <swhyte () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:47:38 -0700
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 13:58, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com> wrote:
On 10 mei 2011, at 22:31, Warren Kumari wrote::: I applaud the first step, but I'm bothered by the fact that no second step is planned.Igor is right on both counts here -- 0.05% is definitely noticeable at these sorts of scale,Ok, removed my infamatory reply. But tell me how 0.05% is visible in the up/down motions of traffic as it starts raining, there is something especially good/bad on TV, people have to reboot because of a Windows update or whatever.
Its the delta between v4 and v6 that is visible and significant. If some machine's addresses are all down hard, that is no problem in this scenario. -Scott
Current thread:
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6, (continued)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 Dan Wing (May 16)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 16)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Arturo Servin (May 16)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 10)
- Banks and IPv6 (was Re: Yahoo and IPv6) Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Igor Gashinsky (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Warren Kumari (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Scott Whyte (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Jason Fesler (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Mark Andrews (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Karl Auer (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Mark Andrews (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 11)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Mark Andrews (May 11)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Matthew Petach (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Scott Helms (May 09)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 09)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Mark Andrews (May 09)