nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:41:09 +0200
On 29 Mar 2011, at 00:18, Wil Schultz wrote:
I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing ipv6 out. A couple of concerns that come to mind are: 1) www.domain.com and ipv6.domain.com are serving the exact same content. Typical SEO standards are to only serve good content from a single domain so information isn't watered down and so that the larger search engines won't penalize. So a big concern is having search results take a hit because content is duplicated through two different domains, even though one domain is ipv4 only and the other is ipv6 only. 2) Not running ipv6 natively, or using 6to4. This (potentially) increases hop count and will put content on a slower GRE tunnel and add some additional time for page load times. 3) ??? Any others that I haven't thought of ??? So basically I'd love to set up some sites for ipv6.domain.com via 6to4 as a phase one, and at some point in the near future implement ipv6 natively inside the datacenter, but I'm somewhat concerned about damaging SEO reputation in the process. Thoughts? -wil
Twitter said: http://twitter.com/#!/look4ipv6/status/24639157611528193 Al least you would have a better page-rank in www.example.com than in ipv6.example.com with the same content. .as
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Fred Baker (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Ryan Rawdon (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Jimmy Hess (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Franck Martin (Mar 29)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 29)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Alexander Harrowell (Mar 30)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 30)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Franck Martin (Mar 30)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 31)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 29)