nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:09:28 -0700
On Mar 28, 2011, at 4:20 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
On Mar 28, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Karl Auer wrote:On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 15:55 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:If you're worried about SEO, go with native IPv6 and then deploy AAAAs for WWW.domain.foo.Why is native IPv6 needed? I'd have thought a tunnel would be fine, too.So why does www A 127.0.0.1 www AAAA ::1 Preclude a tunnel? I can't get native here to my IPv6 is tunneled thru he (Thanks he) but that doesn't change dual DNS entires. (Note used loopback as an example) Tom
Well, hard to tunnel to a loopback address, but, using a better example: www IN A 192.0.2.50 IN AAAA 2001:db8::2:50 Would not preclude a tunnel at all. The issue is that he seemed concerned with additional latency from a tunnel resulting in SEO penalties, so, I suggested native as a resolution to that concern. Owen
Current thread:
- IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? William Pitcock (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Fred Baker (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Ryan Rawdon (Mar 28)