nanog mailing list archives
RE: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet
From: "Stefan Fouant" <sfouant () shortestpathfirst net>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:07:08 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:tme () americafree tv] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:41 PM But that is an excellent reason why someone would want it. I was involved in the IETF NEWDOM WG way back in ~1996 and heard all of these arguments then. IMHO this was snake oil 15 years ago, and it is even more snake oil now.
And I'm afraid we'll be seeing a whole heckuva lot more of this snake oil once ICANN finalizes the Generic TLD process in June: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2382233,00.asp Stefan Fouant
Current thread:
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet, (continued)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John R. Levine (Mar 27)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Eric Brunner-Williams (Mar 27)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John R. Levine (Mar 27)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Tony Finch (Mar 29)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Barry Shein (Mar 27)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Donald Eastlake (Mar 27)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet William Herrin (Mar 27)
- RE: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet George Bonser (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Marshall Eubanks (Mar 26)
- RE: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Stefan Fouant (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Mans Nilsson (Mar 26)