nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS contact?
From: Mike <mike-nanog () tiedyenetworks com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:08:36 -0700
On 03/22/2011 03:58 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
On 03/22/2011 12:24 PM, Franck Martin wrote:+1 They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some progress.I'm glad to hear that, one less extortion racket on the 'net is no bad thing. They might do better by rebranding though. SORBS has one heck of an amount of negative karma for them to get past.
Competently managed and with even a modicum of responsiveness, SORBS could be redeemed. But yeah, they should get a new name, SORBS is tainted in my book.
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS contact?, (continued)
- Re: SORBS contact? TR Shaw (Mar 21)
- Re: SORBS contact? Ken Chase (Mar 21)
- Re: SORBS contact? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? Alexander Maassen (Mar 23)
- Re: SORBS contact? Chris Conn (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? Paul Graydon (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? Mike (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? Steve Atkins (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? Franck Martin (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? Paul Graydon (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? Mike (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? TR Shaw (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? Paul Graydon (Mar 22)
- Re: SORBS contact? TR Shaw (Mar 21)