nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:27:00 -0700
On 3/21/11 10:19 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
Surprised this was actually approved, but more so that this story seems to have gone unnoticed on the list... I would have expected a lot more chatter here - http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/icann-approves-xxx-red-light -district-for-the-internet.ars So the days of pointless TLDs are amongst us as we've now given would-be registrars the right to print money and companies are forced to purchase useless domain names in order to protect their trademarks, prevent squatting, etc. When will sanity prevail?
.biz/.info was 2001
Stefan Fouant
Current thread:
- ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Stefan Fouant (Mar 21)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Joel Jaeggli (Mar 21)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Eric Brunner-Williams (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet William Herrin (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John Levine (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet William Herrin (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John R. Levine (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet William Herrin (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John Levine (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Marshall Eubanks (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Eric Brunner-Williams (Mar 26)
- RE: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Stefan Fouant (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John Levine (Mar 26)