nanog mailing list archives
Re: CSI New York fake IPv6
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:09:34 +0000
On 21/03/2011 06:04, Martin Millnert wrote:
I assume it has been discussed and rejected. Can anyone enlighten us on why?
RFC 3849? Nick
Current thread:
- CSI New York fake IPv6 Skeeve Stevens (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Jay Ashworth (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Jeff Wheeler (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Paul Timmins (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Martin Millnert (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Mar 21)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Fred Baker (Mar 21)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Ina Faye-Lund (Mar 21)
- RE: CSI New York fake IPv6 George Bonser (Mar 21)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Tony Finch (Mar 21)
- RE: CSI New York fake IPv6 Stefan Fouant (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Jay Ashworth (Mar 20)