nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations
From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen () network1 net>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:52:01 -0500 (EST)
But, even one of the small MX80 bundles are about the price of 5 J4350s or 3 J6350s. Granted, if you need the throughput, it is very difficult to beat an MX80, particularly one of the 5g or 10g bundles. -Randy ----- Original Message -----
MX80 is perfect for this.. 5g 10g bundles are cheap.. On Mar 8, 2011 8:49 PM, "Jack Carrozzo" <jack () crepinc com> wrote:Get a cheap J series, load it full of memory, forget about it. If you haven't played with Juniper gear before, you will be quite pleased. -Jack Carrozzo On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:-----Original Message----- From: Chris Enger [mailto:chrise () ci hillsboro or us] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:18 PM To: 'jgoodwin () studio442 com au'; 'nanog () nanog org' Subject: RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Our Brocade reps pointed us to the CER 2000 series, and they can do up to 512k v4 or up to 128k v6. With other Brocade products they spell out the CAM profiles that are available, however I haven't found specifics on the CER series. Chris \CER features are here:http://www.brocade.com/products/all/routers/product-details/netiron-cer-2000-series/features.page
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations tsison () gmail com (Mar 08)
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations Chris Enger (Mar 08)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations Julien Goodwin (Mar 08)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations Julien Goodwin (Mar 08)
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations Chris Enger (Mar 08)
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations George Bonser (Mar 08)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Bret Palsson (Mar 08)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Jack Carrozzo (Mar 08)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Tim Jackson (Mar 08)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Randy Carpenter (Mar 08)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations Julien Goodwin (Mar 08)
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations Chris Enger (Mar 08)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations Chris Woodfield (Mar 09)
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Ulf Zimmermann (Mar 09)
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations sthaug (Mar 09)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Ulf Zimmermann (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Ulf Zimmermann (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations Jeff Wheeler (Mar 10)
- RE: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations George Bonser (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table sizeconsiderations Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 10)