nanog mailing list archives
Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
From: isabel dias <isabeldias1 () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
IPv4? IPv6? are you planning to do NAT or PAT? Are you using a bogous ASN 64512 through 65534 to be used for private purposes? /30 -> 4 addresses/2 hosts -> you can't do a mesh configuration w/ that subnet mask.......... --- On Wed, 6/15/11, James Grace <james () cs fiu edu> wrote:
From: James Grace <james () cs fiu edu> Subject: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses To: nanog () nanog org Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 6:47 PM Hey All, So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering using private /30's for new peerings. Are there any horrific consequences to picking up this practice? Cheers, James
Current thread:
- Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses James Grace (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Cameron Byrne (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Jeff Wheeler (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Tom Hill (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Adam Rothschild (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Dobbins, Roland (Jun 21)