nanog mailing list archives
Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:25:10 -0700
On Jun 14, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:00:22 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:You would need an AWFUL lot of hosts for this to add up to a few 100pps (or even 10pps) of multicast traffic.You're missing the point... most WAPs are horrible with multicast. It doesn't matter if it's v4 or v6, at L2, multicast is multicast. At 100pps the WAP disappears from the network. "It's dead, Jim!" In many cases, a single multicast packet is enough to disrupt traffic flow as the AP stops to fire the multicast frame, individually, at each associated peer. As others have pointed out, IPv6 uses multicast all over the place. DHCPv6 is just one of many sources. All we're saying is DHCPv6 should be like DHCPv4... have a backoff period and eventually give up entirely. (yes, there are v4 agents that continue to try, i.e. restart every 5min, etc.)
Dude... I said that from the beginning. Point is that DHCPv6 isn't going to be the thing that pushes your AP over the edge. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6, (continued)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Jun 16)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 16)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 sthaug (Jun 16)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 16)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 sthaug (Jun 16)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Karl Auer (Jun 15)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 16)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Leo Bicknell (Jun 14)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 14)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Ricky Beam (Jun 14)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 14)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 13)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 11)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 David Conrad (Jun 11)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 12)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 11)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Blake Dunlap (Jun 11)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 12)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Doug Barton (Jun 12)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 13)