nanog mailing list archives

Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:02:18 -0700


On Jun 14, 2011, at 1:48 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:

ND would be a far more frequent occurrence than DHCP requests.

Of course, it was only partly related to the discussion, most likely the network which has problem with multicast 
would break first because of ND, not because of DHCPv6 requests.

Also, I tend to doubt that ANYONE would do DHCP on an exchange point network, so, it's not exactly an applicable 
example environment.

It's the largest IPv6 enabled L2 domain I've experienced :P


Indeed, it tends to be a perversely large L2 domain, but, not one where DHCP would likely occur.

That was kind of my point. You are unlikely to encounter such a large L2 domain outside of an
exchange point.

Owen



Current thread: