nanog mailing list archives

Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:04:38 -0400

On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:42:01 EDT, Jared Mauch said:
On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:27 AM, fredrik danerklint wrote:
The problem is not all on Microsoft at this case.

For example; I've bought a ZyXEL P-2612HNU-F1(which has
802.11n Wireless ADSL 2+ 4-port gateway 2 SIP 2 USB 3G Backup)
in december 2010. It basiclly has everything in it.

You made the mistake of buying something that wasn't compliant with the
following draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-ipv6-required-02

s/mistake/decision/. There, fixed that for you.

I went out  3 years ago and bought a cablemodem and a router that are *also*
not IPv6 ready, because it made economic sense at the time (Got them on sale,
they had every *other* feature I needed, they were easier/cheaper to find at
Best Buy than IPv6-ready gear, Comcast has yet to deploy IPv6 in my area, and
they were cheap enough I don't mind forklift-upgrading them when IPv6 becomes
actually available here.).  They'll probably get replaced within 48 hours of it
being *worth* replacing them.

But at the time, paying literally twice as much for a box that had a feature I was
not likely to be able to use before the box needed replacing *anyhow* didn't make
any economic sense.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: