nanog mailing list archives
Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:38:33 -0400
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Rob V <rob () ipninja net> wrote:
Interesting ... I seem to stay in North America ... I guess it depends what POP you connect to? traceroute6 to nist.gov (2610:20:6060:aa::a66b) from 2001:4978:<snip>:fe67:cafa, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets 1 2001:<snip>::1 1.147 ms 0.461 ms 0.413 ms 2 gw-525.chi-02.us.sixxs.net 30.235 ms 30.380 ms 30.256 ms 3 sixxs.ge-0.0.0-30.core1.chi.bb6.your.org 109.226 ms 29.622 ms 30.270 ms 4 gige-g2-19.core1.chi1.he.net 31.716 ms 31.157 ms 40.147 ms 5 10gigabitethernet7-2.core1.nyc4.he.net 47.923 ms 56.877 ms 48.230 ms 6 2001:504:f::64 49.124 ms 51.467 ms 50.701 ms 7 2600:803:22f::2 63.797 ms 73.429 ms 63.938 ms 8 2600:803:22f::2 62.129 ms 68.801 ms 62.511 ms 9 2610:20:6060:aa::a66b 59.465 ms 76.910 ms 70.083 ms
3 gige-g4-12.core1.ash1.he.net (2001:470:0:90::1) 12.26 ms 6.847 ms 14.985 ms 4 eqx.br6.iad8.verizonbusiness.com (2001:504:0:2::701:1) 7.385 ms 7.783 ms 7.463 ms he and 701 seem to peer? (judging by hostname on the PTR at least) so HE, probably does better than sixxs at least for 701 destinations. (of which nist appears to be one)
-----Original Message----- From: STARNES, CURTIS [mailto:Curtis.Starnes () granburyisd org] Sent: June-08-11 11:27 AM To: Christopher Morrow; David Swafford Cc: nanog () nanog org; DO-webmaster () nist gov Subject: RE: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Typical long trip via a sixxs.net tunnel. Unlike Hurricane Electric (tunnelbroker.net), Sixxs has no US peering that I know of so everything has to hit overseas before returning back. Curtis. -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists () gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:19 AM To: David Swafford Cc: nanog () nanog org; DO-webmaster () nist gov Subject: Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:33 AM, David Swafford <david () davidswafford com> wrote:Interesting, I'm having that same issue w/ www.nist.gov this morning. Front page loads fine, but all links return a 404. Here's my tracert if it helps: tracert www.nist.gov Tracing route to nist.gov [2610:20:6060:aa::a66b] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 2001:1938:2a7::1 2 85 ms 87 ms 84 ms gw-383.phx-01.us.sixxs.net[2001:1938:81:17e::1]phoenix, az,us3 92 ms 99 ms 86 ms 2001:4de0:1000:a4::1 4 98 ms 87 ms 90 ms 1-3.ipv6.r1.ph.hwng.net[2001:4de0:1000:27::2] 5 136 ms 140 ms 131 ms 3-2.ipv6.r1.at.hwng.net[2001:4de0:1000:15::1] 6 167 ms 167 ms 175 ms 2-1.ipv6.r2.dc.hwng.net[2001:4de0:1000:7::1]wash-dc, usa7 246 ms 253 ms 245 ms 5-4.ipv6.r2.am.hwng.net[2001:4de0:1000:5::1]amsterdam, nl! (you seem to have bypassed NIST here...)8 248 ms 247 ms 247 ms AMS-IX.v6.lambdanet.net[2001:7f8:1::a501:3237:1] 9 265 ms 267 ms 265 ms FRA-1-pos413.v6.lambdanet.net[2001:7f0:0:16::1]Frankfurt, DE10 275 ms 268 ms 268 ms 6b1.fft4.alter.net [2001:7f8::319e:0:1]w00t! 12702! - 'lab ipv6 network in EMEA'11 268 ms 304 ms 271 ms gw6.dca6.alter.net [2001:600:c:8::2]back to DC.12 271 ms 271 ms 270 ms 2600:803:22f::2 13 280 ms 272 ms 268 ms 2600:803:22f::22 more hops and home in bethesda... whooo! long trip!14 270 ms 269 ms 273 ms 2610:20:6060:aa::a66b Trace complete.
Current thread:
- www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Andrew Koch (Jun 07)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 07)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day David Swafford (Jun 08)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Christopher Morrow (Jun 08)
- RE: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day STARNES, CURTIS (Jun 08)
- RE: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Rob V (Jun 08)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Christopher Morrow (Jun 08)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Jeroen Massar (Jun 08)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day David Swafford (Jun 08)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day David Swafford (Jun 08)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Matthew Newton (Jun 09)
- Re: www.nist.gov over v6 trouble Was: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 07)