nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 proof of life
From: Tim Chown <tjc () ecs soton ac uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:02:06 +0100
On 7 Jun 2011, at 04:47, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:56:32 +0000, Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org> said:PV> it's been a while since i looked at the query stream still hitting PV> importantly and happily, there's a great deal of IPv6 happening PV> here. Which is reaffirming what many have said for a while: it'll be the server-to-server traffic that will first peak. It's just going to take the client-server relationships years to catch up. Every time I look at my maillogs I've found there is quite a bit of v6 happening. But the web logs show almost nothing.
Other way around here... pushing 2% external web traffic by IPv6, but only about 0.2% of mail traffic, and that would be lower if some of our users weren't on various IETF mail lists. Tim
Current thread:
- v6 proof of life Paul Vixie (Jun 06)
- Re: v6 proof of life Wes Hardaker (Jun 06)
- Re: v6 proof of life Jared Mauch (Jun 06)
- RE: v6 proof of life George Bonser (Jun 06)
- Re: v6 proof of life Arturo Servin (Jun 07)
- Re: v6 proof of life Jared Mauch (Jun 06)
- Message not available
- Re: v6 proof of life Tim Chown (Jun 07)
- Re: v6 proof of life Wes Hardaker (Jun 06)
- Re: v6 proof of life Jima (Jun 07)
- Re: v6 proof of life Paul Vixie (Jun 07)