nanog mailing list archives
Re: website in ipv6
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:52:02 +1000
In message <4E08AF25.4090902 () network-services uoregon edu>, John Kemp writes:
The more optimistic number was that something like 20% - 30% of clients could retrieve an IPV6-Only Literal URL. So yeah, still sad, but there is some potential there.
Given most of that traffic is going through automatic tunnels from behind firewalls that generally havn't been configured to support the tunnels I don't think it is that bad. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- website in ipv6 Deric Kwok (Jun 26)
- Re: website in ipv6 Justin M. Streiner (Jun 26)
- Re: website in ipv6 Mark Andrews (Jun 26)
- Re: website in ipv6 Mark Andrews (Jun 26)
- Re: website in ipv6 John Kemp (Jun 27)
- Re: website in ipv6 Mark Andrews (Jun 27)
- Re: website in ipv6 Mark Andrews (Jun 26)
- Re: website in ipv6 Kenny Sallee (Jun 27)
- Re: website in ipv6 Mark Andrews (Jun 27)
- Re: website in ipv6 Kenny Sallee (Jun 28)
- Re: website in ipv6 Deric Kwok (Jun 28)
- Re: website in ipv6 Mark Andrews (Jun 28)
- Re: website in ipv6 Jason Roysdon (Jun 28)
- Re: website in ipv6 Mark Andrews (Jun 27)