nanog mailing list archives

Re: What do you think about the Juniper MX line?


From: Jeremy <jbaino () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:17:57 -0500

Heh, I spent about 3mo evaluating/testing SRX's and I agree they had
potential but left /a lot/ to be desired.

-Jeremy

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

Sorry... I misspoke. My comments related to the SRX series and not the MX.

The MX is a fine product in my experience.

Owen

On Jun 25, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Howard Hart wrote:


We have a couple installed as our edge routers.

Pluses -  solid as a rock, easy to administer, and will take some
extremely high packet rates for relatively low cost (important for us since
we use them for VoIP traffic). If you're approaching the capacity of a 1GB
uplink, I highly recommend these as your first step to 10 GB.

Minuses - careful on your MX80 version. The MX80-48T includes a built in
48 port 1 GigE switch, but we've had compatibility issues with it and other
vendors switches. The modular version that replaces the MX80-48T costs quite
a bit more, but it does give you a lot more connection and compatibility
options.

Howard Hart

On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:37 PM, "Ryan Finnesey"
<ryan.finnesey () HarrierInvestments com> wrote:

I would love to know the same I am looking at the MX line as well for a
new network build-out

Cheers
Ryan


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris [mailto:behrnetworks () gmail com]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 9:29 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: What do you think about the Juniper MX line?

Hello,

I've been doing some research into using the MX line of Juniper routers
and was interested in hearing people's experiences (the good, bad, and
ugly). What do you like about them? What do you dislike?
Where are you putting them in your network? Where are you not putting
them? Why? What other platforms would you consider and why? I hope to
hear some candid responses, but feel free to respond privately if you
need to.

Thanks!







Current thread: