nanog mailing list archives
Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:19:41 -0700
Not really. A AAAA record adds 28 octets (a A record takes 16). Unless you have a lot of name servers most referrals still fall within 512 octets additionally most answers also still fall withing 512 octets.
1. Most != All even in IPv4 (ran into this in a few hotels with some prominent MMORPG login sites) 2. 512/16 = 32, 512 / 28 = 18 (the 19th record will TRUNC). So, you get just over half the number of records to fit within the same space. I would say that my statement that you are much more likely to encounter TRUNC results and need a TCP query with IPv6 stands. It also matches my experience. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: RE: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet?, (continued)
- Re: RE: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Michael Dillon (Jun 17)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Mark Andrews (Jun 17)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Mark Andrews (Jun 18)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Jimmy Hess (Jun 18)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Jimmy Hess (Jun 19)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Tony Finch (Jun 20)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- RE: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Dennis Burgess (Jun 08)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Jay Ashworth (Jun 08)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Bill Stewart (Jun 10)
- IPv6 Week (was Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet?) Jared Mauch (Jun 10)