nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Linux Server Support
From: Michael Proto <mike () jellydonut org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:03:30 -0400
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Stewart <paul () paulstewart org> wrote:
Hi there. Has anyone compiled a list of pros/cons on various flavors of Linux specific to IPv6? I realize that's a really broad question.. Specific example would be that we're primarily a CentOS shop - during some testing today found out that connection tracking is broken in 5.6 version (after all kinds of Google hits). I understand 6.0 (recently released) fixes this issue. I have not seen this issue in Debian for example to date.
I've tested two Linux distributions in an IPv6 environment, Ubuntu 10.04 Server and CentOS 6. Granted I've only been testing services for a few months now but I've found that both can deliver adequate service delivery via IPv6. I did run into the connection tracking issue with CentOS 5 and you are correct, it is fixed in 6 (its also integrated into the ufw program so setting-up host-based rulesets are very easy in an IPv6 world). In my case, its mainly testing both platforms but I haven't discovered any significant issues with either, and this is running basic services (DNS, HTTP, SMTP, a few little python JSON servers) over a 6in4 tunnel on each platform. -Proto
Current thread:
- IPv6 Linux Server Support Paul Stewart (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv6 Linux Server Support Tom Hill (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv6 Linux Server Support Michael Proto (Jul 26)