nanog mailing list archives
Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
From: Sascha Lenz <slz () baycix de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:28:50 +0200
Hi,
Hi all, I will like to know, from those deploying IPv6 services to residential customers, if you are planning to provide static or dynamic IPv6 prefixes. Just to be clear, I'm for static prefix delegation to residential customers, however I heard that some ISPs are doing dynamic delegations, the same way as is common today with IPv4. I don't thin it make sense, as the main reason for doing so in IPv4 was address exhaustion and legacy oversubscription models such as PPP/dial-up.
well, it does make sense for most of the residential customers nowadays, because they are indoctrinated with this idea of dynamic+NAT == privacy for over a decade now and don't know any better. So, i don't think it's a good idea to hand out static prefixes to residential customers by default, it might cause pain. The best current practice would be, to default to a dynamic prefix, but enable your more advanced customers to change that to a static prefix at will in your customer service web-portal or something. But i have no idea how to sell this to your marketing department. They again are usually used to sell static IPs for an extra fee, and usually don't want to change that with IPv6. That's bullshit for IPv6 of course. (Another idea, which i scrapped after thinking about it in depth was, to hand out a dynamic P2P prefix (/64) + a /56 (or /48) static on top, so the customer/CPE could chose what to use, but that is actually too complicated in the end and would need support in the CPE firmware) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind Regards Sascha Lenz [SLZ-RIPE] Senior System- & Network Architect
Current thread:
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers, (continued)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Karl Auer (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Jason Baugher (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Mark Andrews (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Cameron Byrne (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Joel Jaeggli (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Cameron Byrne (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Sascha Lenz (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 26)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Sascha Lenz (Jul 27)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 27)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Owen DeLong (Jul 26)
- Re: How dynamic is a dynamic IPv6 address? Majdi S. Abbas (Jul 26)
- Re: How dynamic is a dynamic IPv6 address? Leo Bicknell (Jul 27)
- Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)