nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spam?


From: Richard Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:27:21 -0400

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 06:48:54PM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
OMG can't you people run proper spam filtering on your own mail
servers that filter out the nanog messages that are spam?!

One of the fundamental principles of spam mitigation is that blocking
is usually best (in terms of: efficacy, accuracy, resource minimization,
and other metrics) when applied as close to the source as possible.
In the case of mailing lists, such as this one, it has been a best practice
for many years to only permit traffic from subscribers (and optionally,
from individually-listed addresses, which are often alternate addresses
for subscribers).   It is clear that a serious mistake was made during
the attempted migration of this list, i.e., this best practice was not
followed, thus allowing some number of messages from non-subscribers to
reach some number of subscribers.  The proper solution to this is most
emphatically not to ask the thousands of NANOG subscribers to adjust
their mail systems; the proper solution is to continue to employ this
best practice.

---rsk


Current thread: