nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam?
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com>
Also, where is the reply to header?still in the garbage, where it belongs
NANOG, being a traditional, (semi-)public, technical mailing list, has never had a Reply-to header, and never should. I concur with the people who assert that adding the Reply-to header formally violates the relevant RFCs, quite aside from the Real World problems it can (and *has*) caused. http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Spam? Paul Graydon (Jul 12)
- OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Larry Stites (Jul 13)
- Re: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Jeroen Massar (Jul 13)
- Re: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Saku Ytti (Jul 13)
- Re: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Scott Berkman (Jul 13)
- RE: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Mark Gauvin (Jul 13)
- RE: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Nathan Eisenberg (Jul 13)
- Re: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Jason Baugher (Jul 14)
- Re: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Chris Adams (Jul 14)
- Re: OT: Given what you know now, if you were 21 again... Richard Irving (Jul 13)