nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:19:48 -0600
On 1/18/2011 3:03 PM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
I don't think this is the case, on IOS at least. Some years ago I was rocking some 7500s with $not_enough ram for multiple full tables, but with a prefix list to accept le 23 they worked fine.
On JunOS, I know I can view pre and post filtered bgp updates ingress and egress. I seem to recall seeing similar functionality introduced into IOS, though I'm less certain. It's still always advisable to be careful. :)
Jack
Current thread:
- Dual Homed BGP for failover Ahmed Yousuf (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Carrozzo (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Max Pierson (Jan 18)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover George Bonser (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover William Herrin (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Bates (Jan 18)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Brandon Kim (Jan 18)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover George Bonser (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Bates (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Carrozzo (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Bates (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Carrozzo (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Max Pierson (Jan 18)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Ahmed Yousuf (Jan 19)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Randy McAnally (Jan 19)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Ahmed Yousuf (Jan 19)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Randy McAnally (Jan 19)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Bates (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Michel de Nostredame (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Randy Carpenter (Jan 18)