nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 prefix lengths
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:17:41 +0100
if you have multiple sites you should request a direct assignmnet later than /48. previous $employer recieved a /44 direct assignment on the basis of north american footprint. On 1/13/11 4:49 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
Hi all, What IPv6 prefix lengths are people accepting in BGP from peers/customers? My employer just got a /48 allocation from ARIN, and we're trying to figure out how to support multiple end sites out of this (probably around 10). I was thinking about assigning a /56 per site, but looking at the BGP table stats on potaroo.net [1], it looks like this is not too common (only .29% of prefixes). Thoughts? Thanks, --Richard [1] <http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/index.html>
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Mark Andrews (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Randy Carpenter (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths William Pitcock (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Cameron Byrne (Jan 12)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Jeff Wheeler (Jan 13)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Mohacsi Janos (Jan 13)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Luigi Iannone (Jan 13)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Michiel Klaver (Jan 13)
- Re: IPv6 prefix lengths Joel Jaeggli (Jan 13)