nanog mailing list archives
RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Brandon Kim <brandon.kim () brandontek com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:46:19 -0500
For ISL, I know they are trying to phase that out. For the exams, they are based on dot1q..... Even if I had all cisco equipment, I'd try to go with standards because you never know down the road where you may need to use another vendor. I wouldn't use EIGRP if given a choice, I'd go with OSPF or RIPv2.
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:18:00 -0500 From: cra () WPI EDU To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:10:16PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote:To be fair to Cisco and maybe I'm way off here. But it seems they do come out with a way to do things first which then become a standard that they have to follow. ISL/DOT1Q HSRP/VRRP etherchannel/LACPYes, and then they keep their proprietary implementation instead of phasing it out, and no one migrates to the standard one which leads to vendor lockin.
Current thread:
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 11)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Ron Broersma (Jan 11)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? James Smith (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Charles N Wyble (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Joel M Snyder (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Scott Weeks (Jan 12)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chuck Anderson (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Herro91 (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Tony Varriale (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Tony Varriale (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chuck Anderson (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Scott Morris (Jan 13)