nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:31:16 -0600
Once upon a time, Scott Helms <khelms () ispalliance net> said:
Few home users have a stateful firewall configured
Yes, they do. NAT requires a stateful firewall. Why is that so hard to understand? -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?, (continued)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? William Herrin (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? William Herrin (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Lamar Owen (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Steven Kurylo (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Scott Helms (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Chris Adams (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Scott Helms (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? david raistrick (Jan 12)