nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
From: Jay Mitchell <jay () miscreant org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:57:40 +1100
Tell your security guy he should be looking for another job. On 21/03/2007, at 8:41 PM, Tarig Ahmed <tariq198487 () hotmail com> wrote:
We have wide range of Public IP addresses, I tried to assign public ip directly to a server behined firewall( in DMZ), but I have been resisted. Security guy told me is not correct to assign public ip to a server, it should have private ip for security reasons. Is it true that NAT can provide more security? Thanks, Tarig Yassin Ahmed
Current thread:
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?, (continued)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Mark Smith (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jim Gettys (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Mark Smith (Jan 16)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jim Gettys (Jan 16)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Lamar Owen (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Dave Pooser (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jack Bates (Jan 12)
- RE: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Nathan Eisenberg (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jack Bates (Jan 12)