nanog mailing list archives
Re: Satellite IP
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:02:02 -0500
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:06:32 EST, Kelly Olsen said:
That would only happen with an outrageously over-subscribed provider.
OK - I'll feed the troll. What's the proper amount of unused and therefor non-revenue-generating capacity the operator is supposed to reserve in order to *guarantee* that bandwidth will be available? (Hint - the provider doesn't have to be "outrageously" oversubscribed - by definition, if you're oversubscribed *at all*, it's possible for somebody to lose out. It's easy for the provider to be 98% sure that they'll be able to satisfy all the requests. But guaranteeing 100% is a whole nother story...)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Satellite IP Jay Ashworth (Jan 10)
- Re: Satellite IP Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Satellite IP Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: Satellite IP Jay Ashworth (Jan 10)
- Re: Satellite IP Lamar Owen (Jan 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Satellite IP Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Satellite IP Jay Ashworth (Jan 10)
- Re: Satellite IP Jay Ashworth (Jan 10)
- Re: Satellite IP Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: Satellite IP mikea (Jan 11)