nanog mailing list archives
Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:43:44 +0900
you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal warning on who can read it, or how it may be distributed, or whether it may be archived, etc. i do not accept such email. my mail user agent detected a legal notice when i was opening your mail, and automatically deleted it. so do not expect further response. yes, i know your mail environment automatically added the legal notice. well, my mail environment automatically detected it, deleted it, and sent this message to you. so don't expect a lot of sympathy. and if you choose to work for some enterprise clueless enough to think that they can force this silliness on the world, use gmail, hotmail, ... randy
Current thread:
- asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Greg Whynott (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet John Kristoff (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Greg Whynott (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Ken Chase (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Greg Whynott (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Ken Chase (Jan 07)
- Message not available
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Greg Whynott (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Randy Bush (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Greg Whynott (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet John Kristoff (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet John Kristoff (Jan 07)
- Re: asymmetric routes/security concerns/Fortinet Tarig Ahmed (Jan 08)