nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 - real vs theoretical problems


From: Jima <nanog () jima tk>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:58:31 -0600

On 1/6/2011 4:47 PM, Grant Phillips wrote:
I acknowledge and see the point made. There is a lot of dead space in the
IPv6 world. Are we allowing history to repeat it self? Well i'm swaying more
to no.

Have you read this RFC? This is pretty satisfying in making me feel more
comfortable assigning out /48 and /64's. I can sleep at night now! :P

http://tools.ietf.org/html//rfc3177

I can't tell if you're trolling, or if you didn't get the memo from Monday. I guess I'll lean toward the latter.

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg06820.html

     Jima


Current thread: