nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bogons
From: Jacob Broussard <shadowedstranger () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:42:10 -0800
You win. They had that address filtered way before I ever used it, silly me for not checking first :P What I really wanted to say on the list, though, was everyone that waits 1+ years between bogon updates can go to hell. They wait some poor flunky (me) has a customer yelling in my ear because "I could access that website fine before I switched to you".... *sigh* On Jan 28, 2011 5:44 PM, "Matthew Palmer" <mpalmer () hezmatt org> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:35:43PM -0800, Jacob Broussard wrote:Static bogons are the bane of my existence... The pain of trying to
explain
to someone for MONTHS that they haven't updated their reference, with traceroutes to back it up, and they continue to say that it has something
to
do with my network.THey're right -- your network is using an address range they've chosen to configure their equipment not to accept... <grin> - Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Bogons John Payne (Jan 28)
- RE: Bogons George Bonser (Jan 28)
- Re: Bogons John Payne (Jan 28)
- Re: Bogons Jacob Broussard (Jan 28)
- Re: Bogons Matthew Palmer (Jan 28)
- Re: Bogons Jacob Broussard (Jan 28)
- Re: Bogons Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 29)
- Re: Bogons John Payne (Jan 28)
- RE: Bogons George Bonser (Jan 28)