nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 for the content provider
From: "Randy McAnally" <rsm () fast-serv com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:01:31 -0500
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:56:05 -0800, Charles N Wyble wrote
The only issue I've faced is RHEL/CentOS doesn't have stateful connection tracking for IPv6 - so ip6tables is practically worthless.Hmmmm. Interesting. I wonder if this is specific to the RedHat kernel?
I've worked around it by compiling custom (newer) Kernels on systems that need it. Apparently support was added some time around 2.6.20, but of course RHEL5 is still in the dark ages of 2.6.18. ~Randy
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Francois Tigeot (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Antonio Querubin (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Antonio Querubin (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Dale W. Carder (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Charles N Wyble (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Randy McAnally (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Lamar Owen (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 26)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Simon Perreault (Jan 31)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Randy McAnally (Jan 31)
- Re: Ipv6 for the content provider Lamar Owen (Jan 31)