nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
From: Fernando Gont <fernando () gont com ar>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:43:52 -0300
On 25/01/2011 11:29 p.m., Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:Also, the claim that "IPv6 address scanning is impossible" is generally based on the (incorrect) assumption that host addresses are spread (randomly) over the 64-bit IID. -- But they usually aren't.It also doesn't take into account hinted scanning via routing table lookups, whois lookups, and walking reverse DNS, not to mention making use of ND mechanisms once a single box on a given subnet has been successfully botted.
+1 Thanks, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando () gont com ar || fgont () acm org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
Current thread:
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN, (continued)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Laurent GUERBY (Jan 30)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Jan 30)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 30)
- RE: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN George Bonser (Jan 30)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Ray Soucy (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Roland Dobbins (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jimmy Hess (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Roland Dobbins (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Jan 26)