nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:32:59 -0500
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:42:29 -0500, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
Seriously? Repetitively sweeping a /64? Let's do the math...
... We've had this discussion before...If the site is using SLAAC, then that 64bit target is effectively 48bits. And I can make a reasonable guess at 24 of those bits. (esp. if I've seen the address of even one of the machines.)
--Ricky
Current thread:
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN, (continued)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Douglas Otis (Jan 24)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Douglas Otis (Jan 26)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Jan 26)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Michael Loftis (Jan 24)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Patrick Sumby (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Roland Dobbins (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Ricky Beam (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Randy Carpenter (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Mark Smith (Jan 25)