nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld () nsrc org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:26:12 +0100
bmanning () vacation karoshi com (bmanning) writes:
as a test case, i built a small home network out of /120. works just fine. my home network has been native IPv6 for about 5 years now, using a /96 and IVI. some thoughts. disable RD/RA/ND. none of the DHCPv6 code works like DHCP, so I re-wrote client and server code so that it does. static address assignment is a good thing for services like DNS/HTTP secure dynmaic update is your friend summary - its not easy, vendors don't want to help. but it can be done.
Right - /64 is an assumption that's hardcoded many places. But it does work.
Current thread:
- Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Chris Nicholls (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN bmanning (Jan 24)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Phil Regnauld (Jan 24)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN bmanning (Jan 24)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Douglas Otis (Jan 24)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Douglas Otis (Jan 26)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Jan 26)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Phil Regnauld (Jan 24)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Michael Loftis (Jan 24)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Patrick Sumby (Jan 25)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Jan 25)