nanog mailing list archives
Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated
From: Curtis Maurand <cmaurand () xyonet com>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:46:12 -0500
I agree. Many of those corporations would have a hard time justifying an entire /8, even IBM. They just don't run large public networks any longer. Much of what they do is done on private nets. I would make all of the corporate legacy networks justify their /8's. I'll almost bet none of them can justify them any longer. I worked for a large medical company (30,000 seats) and we didn't use an entire /24.Touché! That could theoretically happen. I think Apple should buy HPQDEC just so they can announce 16/7 :-) None of the RIR blocks are going to be routed that way on purpose, though :-) -Randy
--Curtis
Current thread:
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated, (continued)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Randy Carpenter (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Randy Carpenter (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Leen Besselink (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Randy Carpenter (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Jeroen van Aart (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Benson Schliesser (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Jeroen van Aart (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Curtis Maurand (Feb 08)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Owen DeLong (Feb 08)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Curtis Maurand (Feb 08)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated David Conrad (Feb 01)
- Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated Randy Carpenter (Feb 03)