nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 08:22:55 -0800
Firewalls merely constrict it. Not that I advocate against the use of firewalls; in fact, I think I'm agreeing with you, and extending the argument a little further, that we should move from NAT to firewalls, then from stateful firewalls to secure hosts and network security appliances. Lee
I would be fine with that. However, in terms of the art of the possible with the tools available today, IPv6 has no need of NAT, but, firewalls cannot yet be safely removed from the equation. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- RE: quietly.... George Bonser (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 05)
- RE: quietly.... Lee Howard (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... isabel dias (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Blake Dunlap (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Owen DeLong (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Lamar Owen (Feb 10)