nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:02:41 -0600
On 2/4/2011 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
I used to work for CSIRO. Their /16's which were got back in the late 80's will now be /48's.
That's why I didn't try doing any adjustments of X is the new /32. The whole paradigm changes. Many ISPs devote large amounts of space to single corporate network sites. Those sites will now have a single /48. On the other hand, we currently give /32 to residential customers. They also are getting a /48.
Which is why the only way to consider address usage from an ISP and RIR perspective is by how it is handed to a standard ISP of a given size. Originally, ARIN was being overly restrictive and it was "/32 for every ISP". They have loosened up, and will continue to do so (including ISP to ISP) as future proposals come to fruition. So from an ISP perspective, you have to consider your total IPv6 allocation size (within the first 32 bits of IPv6) in comparison to your total IPv4 allocations summed.
From what I can tell, on average, all ISPs are shifting between 8 and 16 bits to the right from their total IPv4 size depending on their primary customer type (residential ISPs shift less than ISPs that primarily only service corporations).
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN, (continued)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Fernando Gont (Feb 03)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN George Herbert (Feb 03)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Eugen Leitl (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN bmanning (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Mark Andrews (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Mark Andrews (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Mark Andrews (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Mark Andrews (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Mark Andrews (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Mark Andrews (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 06)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Mark Andrews (Feb 06)
- What's really needed is a routing slot market (was: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN) John Curran (Feb 06)