nanog mailing list archives
RE: External sanity checks
From: Justin Horstman <justin.horstman () gorillanation com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:25:45 -0800
+1 vote for Gomez, they are the most advanced and most capable in this space. They are also not very cheap... ~J
-----Original Message----- From: Greg Dendy [mailto:gdendy () equinix com] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:35 AM To: Brandon Galbraith Cc: nanog Subject: Re: External sanity checks Gomez isn't too bad either for the http side. http://www.gomez.com/ Greg On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:29 AM, "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith () gmail com> wrote:Pingdom will do most of what you're looking for (www.pingdom.com).We'requite fond of them after a bad Keynote experience. -brandon On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Philip Lavine<source_route () yahoo com>wrote:To all, Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checksagainstyour web/smtp/ftp farms with pings, traceroutes, latency checks aswell asapplication checks (GET, POST, ESMTP, etc) Thank you, Philip-- Brandon Galbraith US Voice: 630.492.0464
Current thread:
- External sanity checks Philip Lavine (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks Brandon Galbraith (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks Greg Dendy (Feb 03)
- RE: External sanity checks Justin Horstman (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks Jeffrey Lyon (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks nevin (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks Christopher Morrow (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks Greg Dendy (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks R A Lichtensteiger (Feb 04)
- RE: External sanity checks Justin Horstman (Feb 04)
- Re: External sanity checks Brandon Galbraith (Feb 03)
- Re: External sanity checks Franck Martin (Feb 03)